Book Review: The Four Laws

May 6th, 2009

A friend lent me the book, The Four Laws of Debt Free Prosperity, which I read in my sparse spare time this last week. Fortunately, it’s a quick short read.

The book’s strength is that it keeps the principles simple and condensed to four main points, which is a great way to go to keep from overwhelming the reader—especially considering that the readers who most need this material are likely already feeling overwhelmed by their financial situation. The four main points or laws are:

  1. Track your spending so you know what you are doing with your money,
  2. Target or set financial goals,
  3. Trim your spending so that you spend less than you earn,
  4. Train yourself in financial matters so that you spend and invest well.

The book further explains and illustrates these points. I liked the chapter on debt-elimination the best. It has some good examples of how to accelerate debt-elimination and can help you not only feel like getting out of debt is possible but motivate you to do it.

The Four Laws was produced by or for Chequemate International (I don’t know the company). This book appears to be part of a system they sell to help you get out of debt and get ahead with your money. Not knowing the company or the rest of their products, I really can’t say anything about them. However, I think this book would be helpful to those who are not sure why they should have a budget or who want to eliminate their debt. It’s one of those books that has a storyline, and the principles being taught are overtly woven into the story—or rather the story is woven into the principles. While these kinds of books do not make for great literature, using the story format makes for a more entertaining read. Plus, this story is a good motivational read for those wanting to get out of debt.

That’s my take on it anyway. If any of you have read it and want to share your two bits, feel free.

Related Posts:

Capital Gains Tax Rates

April 22nd, 2009

Does anybody have to worry about taxes on capital gains right now? It seems most are worrying about capital losses. However, with the market so low compared to where it was last summer there is a decent chance that people who are currently investing (and likely buying low) will have reason to consider capital gains tax rates before they sell their investments in the future.

(Note, this assumes investments, such as mutual funds and stocks. Other types, such as real estate, have slightly different rates.)

2009 Capital Gains Tax Rates

Time Held
Tax Bracket
35%
33%
28%
25%
15%
10%
< 1 year (short-term)
35%
33%
28%
25%
15%
10%
> 1 year (long-term)
15%
15%
15%
15%
0%
0%

Basically, you pay your regular income tax rate, if you sell the the investment within a year of buying it. If you wait at least one year from the date of purchase, your tax rate drops significantly.

However, the law regarding these tax rates is set to end after 2010. At which time the tax rates would return to what they were up to 2003, which also includes a slightly lower rate for holding investments more than five years.

2011 Capital Gains Tax Rates

Time Held
Tax Bracket
35%
33%
28%
25%
15%
10%
< 1 year (short-term)
35%
33%
28%
25%
15%
10%
> 1 and < 5 years (long-term)
20%
20%
20%
20%
10%
10%
> 5 years (long-term)
18%
18%
18%
18%
8%
8%

Let’s hope that Congress votes to keep the rates low—better yet, let’s encourage them to do so.

That’s my two bits. What are yours?

Related Posts:

Everything Has a Cost

April 15th, 2009

Everything has a cost. I have alluded to this point previously but wanted to discuss it more specifically. We all make decisions that have costs associated with them. In general, I think there are many decisions we make that aren’t necessarily right or wrong; we should just be deliberate about them.

For example, a sense of financial security may be very important to me, and the stock market seems scary. I can make the decision to only “invest” my money in bank CDs. I’m trading the higher rate of return I could get from the stock market for the sense of security I feel with the bank. Long term there could easily be the difference of hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost interest by making that decision. It’s important that I’m honest and acknowledge that I’m foregoing great potential returns and a more comfortable retirement for a greater sense of security now.

Personally, this cost equation tends to be an element of most decisions I make. Take something as mundane as going out to lunch. It isn’t just an experience in which I eat and hope I have enough money at the end of the month to cover the meal but a recognition that I have a certain amount of money budgeted that I can spend on lunch. If I don’t spend it on lunch, I could spend it on something else. Neither choice is right or wrong; it’s just a conscious decision, assuming I wasn’t given the money by my dying Aunt Tilda, who asked me to donate it all to the beleaguered League of Penniless Penny Pinchers.

In general, I think we are often willing to trade a certain sense of security, pride, fun, or comfort now for less of it in the future. This can be security in the form of “I need to pay $25,000 for this new car so my family can be ’safe’;” or pride in the form of “If I buy this fancy techno gadget, I’ll be the envy of all three of my friends;” or fun in the form of “I will buy this boat when I am 22, even though it means it pushes back reaching my investment goals by 3 years;” or comfort in the form of “I won’t spend any money, because it’s wrong and I want to keep it all so that I can make sure I have enough.”

That last point is an extreme type of saver that is so focused on hoarding money that they lose the opportunity to enjoy the things that money can buy. That loss comes at a cost—everything has its cost. It seems best if we can find a balance—not fall too far on the hoarding side or the shopping spree side—and make conscious decisions about what “costs” we are incurring.

There’s my two bits on the matter. Do you see other costs or ways to consider them?

Related Posts:

Education, is it Worth it?

April 11th, 2009

Is education worth it? There seems to be a general inclination in our country to suggest that you can’t put a price on education—whatever the cost, it is worth it to get the best education possible. This applies both to arguments for funding elementary and secondary public schools as well as to individuals looking for the perfect college program.

While I would agree that education has great value, both in your own quality of life and for effecting change in the world around you, I would also suggest that education is not always “good debt.” If you can’t afford an education at a specific institution, seriously rethink your approach to your education.

First off, how do you determine “the best” education? It would probably be easier to debate a topic like abortion than try to pin that one down. There is a lot of subjectivity regarding what is best for people with different interests or for those pursuing different professions. For example, if I’m planning on becoming an airplane mechanic, an engineering degree from Stanford’s engineering program in Aeronautics and Astronautics probably won’t help all that much. I would be better off both financially and in my professional preparation, by looking for a two-year vocational program.

But you may have heard the argument that going to an Ivy League school is your best route, because Ivy League graduates tend to make connections with important people and have better job opportunities after graduation. While in some instances this may be true, I recall reading an article several years back—which unfortunately I could not find—suggesting that the reason students who attend top-tier schools tend to get better job offers after graduation, is not necessarily because of the school itself. Rather, it is because they tended to be wealthier and better connected to begin with. Students who are wealthier and have solid family and professional contacts tend to go to more prestigious universities, and because they are already wealthier and better connected, they tend to get better jobs after graduation.

High school and college students are done a disservice when they are constantly told that they need an education to succeed but aren’t taught how to figure out what educational opportunities make financial sense. An article by Sandra Guy on FastWeb has a good suggestion: At a minimum, create a budget based on how much you are likely to make after you graduate and include the expense of repaying your student loan. You can estimate the loan repayment with a loan calculator (I recommend using Microsoft Excel’s loan amortization calculator). This could be a reassuring exercise or a wake-up call about your educational aspirations.

Personally, while I didn’t perform the exercise Guy suggests, I did consider my ability to pay for school. After applying to graduate school, I was accepted to my two top picks: 1st) University of Michigan’s School of Information, and 2nd) Indiana University’s School of Library and Information Science. At the time, the two schools had relatively similar programs and were ranked neck and neck by U.S. News & World Report. However, among universities as a whole, Michigan was ranked in the top 25 but Indiana (IU) wasn’t even in the top 100. Not coincidentally, Michigan also cost twice as much as IU. I wondered if the additional expense for Michigan was really worth it, but a part of me kept thinking, “Yeah but wouldn’t it be so much cooler to tell people you went to Michigan?” That was the vain part of me. Then the rational part of me would say, “Yeah, but that is a lot of money. Do you really want all that debt?” Then my better half (my wife) said, “Why don’t you go with the one that is working for you?”

That was the best advice I could have received. There were a number of things that had happened with IU that just seemed to be clicking with me and fitting my needs. I accepted IU’s offer and it continued to work out. I loved the program and had a great experience. It prepared me very well. It’s possible life would have turned out differently in terms of my career and pay had I gone to Michigan, but I doubt it. Nothing against Michigan but considering my industry’s salary range and what I earn, I’d be surprised if I made much if anything more as a result of a degree from Michigan. I doubt it would have been enough to warrant the additional student loan debt I would have incurred.

Financially speaking, all of your education has failed you if your major or graduate program is something like ancient Roman history, with the intent to teach high school and the tuition alone costs you $25,000 a year—unless you have the money to pay for the program. A lot of things besides education have value—cars, houses, boats, family vacations—and some things certainly have more value than others. But they also have a price. Just be smart about how you weigh the value of an education.

Related Posts:

Good is the Enemy to Great

March 26th, 2009

I think that this post’s title may have also been a phrase used in Jim Collins’ book, Good to Great, but it’s appropriate for some thoughts I’ve had about our current economy. Good is the enemy to great, because we tend to become complacent and content as long things are good. In general, work and life don’t have to be great; and as long as they aren’t bad, we chug along fat, dumb, and happy. Actually we may not even be all that happy. We’re content to ride along with a bur in our saddle; however, if our bicycle seat is missing, most of us will take action. That’s why good is the enemy to great. Unless the fire gets unbearably hot, we’re not inclined to move.

The current economy may be enough to spur people into action. Even though—contrary to popular opinion—our nation’s and the world’s economy hasn’t completely collapsed, leaving everyone destitute and about to die of starvation, it has unsettled many. Most of us know people who have lost their jobs or been affected in some way. Most of the companies we work for have been affected in some way (for some companies, the effect has been increased business).

The silver lining in all this seems to be the opportunity for change. It may not be the kind of change people were looking for when they voted for President Obama, and it likely isn’t what he intended. But it is an opportunity for change. At my work, we have experienced some slowing, which has caused the company to take a look at itself and see if there are any opportunities it is missing. The result has been some great brainstorming sessions, and we are now working on an interesting project that we probably never would have considered previously.

This economic dip could be a proverbial blessing in disguise for many. People who have been laid off may be able to pursue a change in life and career that they were considering for a long time but never had sufficient motivation to shake them from their adequately content stupor. That doesn’t mean it will be easy. For most people, it will likely still be very difficult but extremely rewarding.

For example, a few years back, my brother and brother-in-law worked for a steel detailing company. One day both of them along with most the rest of the company were laid off.  This created a very stressful time for both of them and their families. Both of them intended to find work in the same field but ultimately decided to partner and create their own steel detailing business rather than hire on somewhere else. The endeavor was a little uncertain at first, not because they couldn’t find projects but because getting paid tended to take up to 90 days after completing the project. As long as they could make their money last until they got paid for the first few projects, they thought they would be okay. They just weren’t sure the money would last. Fortunately it did. Owning their own business has not been easy, but it has been very rewarding. My brother told me, “After owning my own business, there is no way I could go back to working for someone else.” The business, Freedom Steel Detailing, has done very well. What began as a crisis, turned into a blessing.

Likewise, as long as there isn’t too much meddling and stimulating to keep the credit bubble artificially inflated, this economic situation could be a great blessing, allowing us to reset, readjust, and refocus our national, corporate, and personal economies—or better yet, our lives.

What do you think? Do you see opportunity?

Related Posts: